Basically, like all the other unprovable theories these scientists have concoted, this observation flies in the face of typical evolutionary style thinking.
The evolutionaries state that a star similar to our sun is in its early to middle stages of existence. As the star loses its hydrogen energy source in the nuclear fusion process, it begins to take on helium. When the helium becomes a substantial by-product, the star becomes a red giant. When the red giant runs out of hydrogen, the star will explode, leaving a white dwarf, that in turn may later become a black hole.
That’s the theory, anyway. This observation seems to make the theory bogus.
Huh? What the hell are you talking about? Your statement made no sense, was contradictory, and if I interpret correctly, not even CLOSE to the working theory of how star lifecycles function.
I don’t call myself an evolutionist, I think it has lots of holes, but when those who actively oppose it can’t even refute a theory by restating the most basic aspects of it, it makes you look like a friggin’ idiot and does your position a disservice.
Not even close! Want to try again?