[PeaRidge]

Of course the marriages existed, and they were documented where I said. Check the 1850 census again. You will find that the census taker asked if marriages had occurred. You are simply wrong.

[Non-Sequitur]

Of course the marriages existed, and they were documented where I said. Check the 1850 census again. You will find that the census taker asked if marriages had occurred. You are simply wrong.

I believe you are the one who is wrong. How could a marriage be registered in the census when it did not legally exist? Why would slaves be surveyed in the census in the first place when they were not considered people?

[Non-Sequitur]

You will find that the census taker asked if marriages had occurred.

Here is the 1850 census form. As you can see it was filled in by free inhabitants of a given locality and not by slaves.

[stand watie]

he's not wrong. instead he's doing what he does: SPREADING the PROPAGANDA of the most extreme LEFTIST/statist/lunatic fringe of academia.

always remember that N-S is a PROPAGANDIST first & foremost & that LYING is his trade.UNFORTUNAYELY, he is GOOD at it.

free dixie,sw