Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
You said: "But in your scenarion (sic) they are first landed in a Northern port, taxed, re-loaded, and shipped South.

Yes, most of the goods headed for east coast destinations went through that process.

You said: "If such a large percentage was destined for Southern consumers then why not send them direct?

They were. Quite a large percentage of the goods were direct shipped to New Orleans and Mobile.

You said: "Why the additional cost of the stop in New York? If it's a question of warehouses, they could as easily be built in Charleston as in Boston.

If you would like more information on that, I will give it to you.

1,788 posted on 07/30/2009 1:36:47 PM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1683 | View Replies ]


To: PeaRidge
Yes, most of the goods headed for east coast destinations went through that process.

Why? Why go through the expense of landing, paying tariffs, reloading, and shipping south? Why not take them there directly?

They were. Quite a large percentage of the goods were direct shipped to New Orleans and Mobile.

For every dollar of tariff paid in New Orleans and Mobile almost 17 were paid in New York.

1,896 posted on 08/09/2009 5:43:54 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1788 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson