If you go back to my post in this thread, I said I remain a skeptic about Sasquatch. I concluded a long time ago that if Sasquatch existed, someone, somewhere would have discovered a body, shot one, or provided provided some form of irrefutable physical evidence of the Sasquatch. While I remain a skeptic about Sasquatch, I'm not convinced by the food argument. It doesn't seem valid to me for the reasons I stated earlier.
I find crypto-zoology interesting, so I follow developments casually. I would be surprised if Sasquatch is discovered and shocked if most other crypto-creatures are discovered. The exception is the Tasmanian Tiger. My hunch is that someday, probably soon, there will be confirmation that the Tasmanian Tiger survived extinction. Of course, the big difference is that we know for sure that at one time (prior to the late 1930s) that Tasmanian Tiger existed unlike Sasquatch.
Okay. Me too, pretty much. Except that having spent a lot of time in Oklahoma, I’m pretty skeptical about the food.