Well I was going to be a psychologist and was really into Jungian Psychology (I’m sure being as learned as you are you must know what he said about UFOs).
No I apparently do not have the experience you do in regards to the UFO phenomena, and don’t know what a TYPE II ERROR is.
But I must protest your implying that I am narrow and rigid about such things. As I said, when I was younger I fiercely believed that we were visited. If anything I was narrow and rigid THEN and have since become more open-minded.
My ‘cheeky derisiveness’, as you called it and if it was such, was simply turning the other ‘cheek’ in response to your rather strong response to my first comment.
Welllll,
glad you are not a typical naysayer, then.
Apologies for hasty classification.
Glad you had some earlier interest and that you may not be as narrow and rigid as so many are.
A TYPE I ERROR SAYS SOMETHING IS THERE WHEN NOTHING IS THERE.
A TYPE II ERROR SAYS NOTHING IS THERE WHEN SOMETHING IS THERE.
THEY ARE DYNAMICALLY INEXORABLY RELATED. One CANNOT be extremely avoidant and aversive to a TYPE I error WITHOUT essentially making it virtually certain that they will fall victim to a nasty bite from a harsh TYPE II error.
Typical naysayers hereon seem so extremely outrageously blind and rigid; narrow, arrogant, haughty about avoiding a TYPE I error at such chronic constant routine extremes that they essentially are insuring that a TYPE II ERROR in the topic of UFOs will eventually bite them and very harshly and hard.
They seem absolutely clueless about such even when warned.
Yes, I’m familiar with Jung’s take on UFO’s. He was also into various occult practices and beliefs. Essentially, I think he did not know what he was talking about having swallowed the occultic poison for so many years on so many fronts.
Consider
to find out my perspective on the occult and UFO’s.
Being a bright, atypical psychologist may be neither here nor there. However, the extensive experience over the years has allowed me some confidence in my capacity to assess the authenticity of the personal stories I’m being told—particularly face to face.
The FREEPER who DID HOLD THE VERY REAL CRASHED SAUCER DEBRIS COMPONENTS brought by the house on the initial pick-up of same from the farm, before taking them to the base . . . I have met Jesse Marcel Jr, MD face to face etc.
He’s the real deal many times over. And I intensely resent ANYONE casting any aspersions on his character or on his very real and authentic personal story. I consider him a very patriotic hero, Friend and a Christian Brother.
And I consider virtually anyone casting derisive, incredulous aspersions on his story to be clueless low life idiots.