Funny, both had free trade as their foundation. I’m talking about the common concept of free trade in both.
How about you tell me how they differed in terms of free trade? How is the NAFTA that Reagan proposed different from the NAFTA that George HW Bush got Canada and Mexico to sign (prior to Clinton’s inauguration)?
I'll call your empty bluff. Prove it. Quotes, please.
By the way, Obama is promising even more changes to the evolving NAFTA agreement to incorporate additional labor and environmental provisions. Is "free trade" the foundation of Obama's position, like you claim it was for Bill Clinton?