Replies

You know, you are looking like a real ass -- posting lie after lie and misrepresenting not only what was aked, but what was answered.

Please point out where I lied; shouting "LIE!" does not suffice.

I know you have clarified your position after I discussed with you, and I have apologized for any insult and errors I may have made; how nice it would be for you and your fellow anti-free-traders on this thread to extend the same courtesy!

But please point out where I have lied. Failure to do so stains your own claimed intellectual purity and simply fades you to the shadows of irrelevancy.

If you want to be taken at all seriously, why don't you clean up your act?

Please point out where I was slanderous or insulting. And while you're at it, I am sure you equally condemn Mojave for his ungrounded and flat-out invectives hurled in just the last 100 posts.

I did actually learn something on this thread, despite your arrogance. You could use a bit of intellectual honesty in your attempts to convince people.

Again, the onus is on you to point it out; if I lied, I would like to be shown where, and I will gladly apologize and issue mea cuplus.

As it is, I wouldn't trust you to walk my dog.

Then I would not have to clean up after the fecal matter deposited, and leave that chore to yourself; both I and your dog would be in improved situations!

Then I would not have to clean up after the fecal matter deposited, and leave that chore to yourself; both I and your dog would be in improved situations!

And for the record, madam, that IS an insulr and one that I would repeat again in the same circumstances.

Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible

Enjoy the pain of your own defense, madam.

Please point out where I lied

Don't give me that innocent act. Check out your post that I responded to, or a previous post where you restated TPs question"

"What is your position on average tariffs when Reagan entered office and when he left office? After 2 terms, were they higher or lower?"

You claimed in the first case:

[mojave] "never answered that question."

and then got more condescending, claiming:

"Mojave - not knowing the answer, and apparently too insecure to state as much - answered a different question"

Mojave had already responded quite clearly to the original post

"I don't know what the figures were for 1988."

If you don't know the numbers, how can one possibly say whether they are higher or lower?

You continuing to claim that he did not answer is a blatant lie, in my book.