That's the argument you are constructing: you are arguing that we ignore the weight of historical evidence concerning Reagan's commitment to free markets and assume that he did not favor the result of a policy he created, promoted, and worked to establish. In other words, everything he worked for should be discounted because of who ultimately implemented it.
"What did he say" about Clinton's "version?" Tell us. Proceed with your argument.
[crickets]
Really? Was the version that Reagan supported full of the environmental crap that Clinton inserted?
Sounds like more RINO lies.