Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mojave
I'm not the one trying to prove something about Reagan on this thread, what were you trying to prove again?

[Cowardly silence ensues]

491 posted on 05/12/2009 12:14:42 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
I'm not the one trying to prove something about Reagan on this thread

I'm loving the rat like terror you're exuding.

Do you have those numbers or not?

492 posted on 05/12/2009 12:16:32 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]

To: Toddsterpatriot
I'm not the one trying to prove something about Reagan on this thread, what were you trying to prove again?

I'm thinking that he thinks there's some sort of a dispute about that "average tariffs" number. Problem is, I don't see anyone disputing it. He just doesn't realize that it fails to prove what he thinks it does.

I could argue that the merchandise goods trade deficit was higher when Reagan left office than when he entered, also. No one is stupid enough to argue that Reagan was a failure for that reason (though you'd think a protectionist might try).

494 posted on 05/12/2009 2:30:18 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson