Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl

OK, I’ll choose the latter: international trade that is free of such government interference as protective tariffs and import quotas.


435 posted on 05/11/2009 7:03:12 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies ]


To: PugetSoundSoldier

Please consider this: if you cannot make them see eye-to-eye with you regarding the definition of a term (and they are unwilling to provide their own), then we’re all just here shooting the breeze . . . .


437 posted on 05/11/2009 7:15:11 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies ]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
And seriously, think about it . . . they are so unwilling to give an inch because of their own lack of faith that they cannot even agree to common terms.
438 posted on 05/11/2009 7:18:54 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies ]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
OK, I’ll choose the latter: international trade that is free of such government interference as protective tariffs and import quotas.
(emphasis added to quote from free dictionary)

I didn't ask you to choose one of two free dictionary definitions. I asked you the same question you asked of me.

What is your position on free trade?

"please state what your position is on free trade as defined by the free dictionary"
Can you answer that, please.
440 posted on 05/11/2009 7:25:02 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson