Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl

Thank you for your answer. You position is that you have no position because it can be used to make you think and question your own little comfortable existence. So you choose no position except to attack others as being wrong.

Thank you for your contributions to this thread!

PS: I’m not really an insulting little cuss; arrogant and abrasive perhaps, but not insulting...


428 posted on 05/11/2009 6:13:11 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]


To: PugetSoundSoldier
You position is that you have no position because it can be used to make you think and question your own little comfortable existence.

That is what you got from this?

My "position" is that those are pretty simplistic definitions given what we see characterized today as "free trade." I largely believe in the theory of free trade for non-essential items or non-critical industries (which would exclude basic food items, items/material required for national defense, etc.). But I don't believe that what we see today in FTAs represents "free trade" in the slightest.
Please "state what your position is on free trade as defined by the free dictionary" so I can understand the type of response you might find adequate.
431 posted on 05/11/2009 6:26:19 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson