We may be making progress.
I think it has been established that NAFTA is “managed trade.”
We’ve also established that “free trade” differs from “managed trade.”
Accordingly, NAFTA is not “free trade.”
Does that make NAFTA a protectionist agreement? ;-)
I think that there was also an assertion made that it was incorrect to assume that "free trade" wasn't "managed trade." There's a lot of smoke in the air.
More importantly do you think that, because you've "proved" (didn't see anyone arguing that point, really) the above, we should "manage" trade even more, as you suggest?