[PugetSoundSoldier]

That's what's funny, and why you can't get a straight answer. I don't think our friend supports free trade at all, which is why he's so emotional about the Reagan thing.

I think that's abundantly clear... It is objection to free trade at its heart that is the concern, not any obscure rider on a bill that is the concern. His position is fundamentally anti-free-trade - essentially anti-capitalism, and he is using some environmental concern over NAFTA as a cover.

Also interesting to see the other anti-capitalism folks have dropped out, once the references started coming out.

And I still haven't been told which car is more American...:)

[Mojave]

His position is fundamentally anti-free-trade

And your position is fundamentally hatred of Ronald Reagan and a desire to lie about him without being contradicted.

I'm done with you.

[1rudeboy]

What’s ironic is that Nader’s greenies and the Teamsters tried to use environmental laws (if they didn’t try to use some NAFTA provisions/codicils/whatever, you can be sure that they took a long look at them) in order to prevent the cross-border trucking program, and the U.S. Supreme Court bitchslapped them back to California.