Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rjsimmon
Well, you could read the original paper,

Arnold, J. R., & Libby, W. F. (1949). Age Determinations by Radiocarbon Content: Checks with Samples of Known Age. Science, 110, 678-680.

but basically they compared their computed results to a “curve of knowns” (historically verified objects). Libby recognized an error and revised the method to arrived at the Cambridge Half-life (5730+/-40).

I don't know about thorium 232, but comparing the ratio of uranium 234 and thorium 230 is used as a dating method (one is soluble, the other is not).

24 posted on 05/06/2009 12:22:48 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: stormer

Thank you, I will have to look up the paper.


27 posted on 05/06/2009 12:46:55 PM PDT by rjsimmon (1-20-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson