Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
You think this is why God called pigs “unclean” animals? Hmmmmm...what does God know? Hmmmm.....

This is all above my pray grade but I suspect that is tradition and not commandment.

Now I'll sit back to await my flogging.

6 posted on 04/30/2009 10:43:34 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: decimon

The researchers did not find a significant difference in effects from the 1918 and 1930 viruses in infected pigs. This was surprising, since the 1918 virus killed more than 20 million people and was lethal to ferrets, mice and macaques. Another surprising finding from the study was the rapid antibody response in the animals infected with the 1918 virus, which is not typically reported for the swine influenza virus.


This supports the alternate theory that it was not the virus that killed but a co-infection of strep for which we did not have antibiotics in 1918. The strep coinfection would not have occurred in the 1930 cases.


8 posted on 04/30/2009 11:09:15 AM PDT by bioqubit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

They were unclean under Old Testament law and then were made fit to eat under New Testament law (Peter and the animals lowered on a cloth vision). Not sure why...but, with modern handling methods and cooking, we can eat them without an issue. However, one must remember the disease factor when handling pork.


23 posted on 04/30/2009 2:42:52 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson