Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Liberty1970
If it is functional in the ape orientation for ape locomotion, and not functional in humans in erect locomotion, then why would natural selection first push a change and then abandon it?

Because the evolution of the animal ended up with that muscle not being needed. Evolution is not perfect, with a lot of dead-ends and half-assed results. It is a process.

75 posted on 04/28/2009 8:55:32 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
Because the evolution of the animal ended up with that muscle not being needed. Evolution is not perfect, with a lot of dead-ends and half-assed results. It is a process. I don't think you've grasped it. Natural selection only causes a change to become fixed in a population if the change is beneficial (provides more offspring, in essence). Natural selection "tries out" individual mutations, but if the specific mutation for the new orientation doesn't work out, natural selection acts against it immediately. It doesn't engage in wholesale replacement throughout the entire population and _then_ decide it wasn't a good idea.

So if the current plantaris lacks a function in this orientation, according to evolutionary theory there still had to be a function for it in this orientation in the past. Otherwise it would never have migrated in the first place.

77 posted on 04/28/2009 9:40:13 AM PDT by Liberty1970 (Democrats are not in control. God is. And Thank God for that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson