Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Arrowhead1952

A V-5 is inherently unbalanced, as were the engineers who designed it! ;)


6 posted on 04/24/2009 5:24:33 AM PDT by Jagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jagman
A V-5 is inherently unbalanced, as were the engineers who designed it! ;)

That's what I figured. Having been around engines and vehicles most of my life, engines with an odd number of cylinders are not balanced as well as the V-6 or V-8 or even inline engines.

I have a neighbor who works for a Dodge dealer and he said the same about Dodge's two biggest mistakes.

#1. Rushing to be the first with a V-10

#2. The PT Cruiser

13 posted on 04/24/2009 5:45:00 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (It took almost 250 years to make the USA great and 30 days for "The Failure" BO to tear it down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Jagman
A V-5 is inherently unbalanced, as were the engineers who designed it! ;)

This was also an objection to the first 90 degree V6 engines back in the early 60s. As it turned out, IIRC, the movement generated in any one direction by the unbalanced condition was so small and so brief at operating rpms that the vibrating parts 'floated' inside the crankshaft bearing clearances without ever transferring the vibration to the rest of the engine. Or so I heard.

20 posted on 04/24/2009 6:30:49 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson