To: Arrowhead1952
It's an Inline-5, not V-5, with 3.5L displacement. It has more HP, but less torque than your 4.3L V6. Unloaded, it should give you better mileage than the 4.3. Loaded down, I would expect the numbers to more comparable. The engine has the same bore x stroke as the Inline-4 2.7L, and the Inline-6 4.2L. All three are basically the same engine, with different #’s of cylinders. Hope this helps.
To: BMiles2112; Bryanw92
The Colorado was a huge disappointment compared to the S-10, It has more HP, but less torque than your 4.3L V6.
Thanks for the help. With the previous replies that reference valve problems, I think I'll try to find another PU with a 4.3, rather than the 5 cyl. I remember working on the in line 250 and 292 CU IN engines and we called those "hot water sixes" back in the 70's.
16 posted on
04/24/2009 5:55:31 AM PDT by
Arrowhead1952
(It took almost 250 years to make the USA great and 30 days for "The Failure" BO to tear it down.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson