[dragnet2]

That’s a brilliant point. But I like your imagination.

Certainly not brilliant, just open minded. Lack of evidence only means everything is suspect, and we lack the big facts.

[coffee260]

"Certainly not brilliant..." I was just being kind. But you are right.

There's a lack of evidence that dragons exist. Does that mean "...everything is suspect, and we lack the big facts?" Or does it mean dragons are an imaginary creature invented in the minds of man?

And what do you mean by "big facts?" Is there little facts to suggest UFO's are more than unidentified-flying-objects? Meaning an object that was spotted flying in the sky is unidentified to the witness of that object at that particular time?

I certainly wouldn't suggest that because someone "witnessed" a streak of fire in the sky that dragons exist. I'd simply conclude that what that witness saw was something they couldn't conclusively identify. But to jump from seeing fire in the sky too dragons must have caused it is fiction.

Something being unidentifiable while flying in the sky is a huge difference than extrapolating that said object is alien in origin. Meaning from another planet. There is no way to jump from lack of understanding to a conclusive fact.