Spamming the forum with a deluge of articles of attacks
is propaganda and fear mongering.
Anyone doing that is going to single themselves out
because it's aberrant behavior, out of the norm.
It's an indication of inner anger and a quasi-religious fervor
that can't be dealt with directly in a rational manner.
Look I don't drink.
I can could quite easily assume the role of a rabid anti-alcohol zealot.
I'd call it the Drink of Peace (DOP)
I could post 5,6,7 or 8 posts a day on the horrible deaths that involved alcohol.
I could post gruesome photos of victims of alcohol.
I'd call those that oppose the ban on alcohol lowlifes, criminals,
fiends that don't mind seeing young children maimed or killed
as long as they can have their drink.
I could tell them how there are many other drinks
just a tasty as alcohol but that are safer.
I'd tell them no one needs alcohol.
I'd tell them people can't be trusted to consume alcohol responsibly.
Oh, there may be some that can drink responsibly
but they're going to have to put up with the ban for the greater good.
And I would do this multiple times a day, day after day, week after week.
I'd find a little cadre of fellow zealots, we would support each other
and let any alcohol lovers (DOPers) that came on the thread know how despicable they are in no uncertain terms.
Now how long do you think on a conservative board
would it take for me to single myself out?
I really got to hit the hay now...catch ya later
Who are YOU to decide what is appropriate or not on a board where you are not an owner nor a moderator?
This is BS because you and who ever else feel it necessary to single him out because you don’t agree with his opinion.
Is there a 12 step program to prevent the impulsively offended from clicking on his threads?
Did you go after Ron Paul supporters with the same vigor?
This is childish and I’m not letting it go.
I ask again if singling out a poster because he posts credible articles regarding pit bulls allowed by the mods, owners and forum rules?