Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/06/2009 10:05:25 AM PDT by JoeProBono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Quix

Good work by MUFON.


2 posted on 04/06/2009 10:14:01 AM PDT by BenLurkin (And oh, Hey! I've been travelin' on this road too long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono
Wow, Liz Taylor's looking really bad these days!
3 posted on 04/06/2009 10:23:18 AM PDT by JennysCool (Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action - Ian Fleming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

Some hoaxes are bettter than others.


4 posted on 04/06/2009 10:25:13 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

On a fairly still night, you can use plastic grocery bags and a tea-light candle (with a little duct tape to secure the tea light) to make your own UFO’s. As the wax burns away, they get higher. Sometimes it takes some of the wax burning off to get them to fly, i generally scrape half of it out, first.


6 posted on 04/06/2009 10:27:19 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

8 posted on 04/06/2009 10:42:59 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

Oh Come on now!! CRIMINAL CHARGES?? for a harmless goof???


9 posted on 04/06/2009 10:48:07 AM PDT by Mr. K (physically unable to proofreed (<---oops))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

That’s one u(fo)gly perp there...


11 posted on 04/06/2009 12:12:50 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono
The first attempt at a hoax appears to be a report filed with MUFON on Jan. 5, 2009. Other hoax dates are Feb. 7 and Feb. 17, 2009. But MUFON called this one correctly on Jan. 7, 2009... The following is D'Antonio's statement on the case from Jan. 7. "I noted that the lights seemed to operate independently, and were brightening and dimming independently, as in a flickering effect, indicative of a typical flame-based light source that I have seen countless times. By flame-based I mean a flying light created by a Chinese Lantern or a flare. A Chinese Lantern, as you already must know, is a paper balloon envelope with a heat source suspended underneath in the opening that heats the envelope making a crude hot air balloon until the flame goes out. Further, in the report, the indication was that the lights went out one by one. This is very telling. When lights go out one-by-one, that usually means that they were LIT one after another. A flare that lasts 20 minutes has burned for 4-5, say by the time the LAST one in the chain is lit, and they are all released if performed by a person or two. So this staggered fadeout pattern is expected in such situations and is what happened in this case. Whether this event was due to Chinese Lanterns, as I thought they could be, or flares, didn't matter actually. It was clear to me after viewing the video that this is not a UFO, but was a man-made hoax event. I informed the STAR team, that in my opinion, this was a man-made event, and not a true UFO of any kind. I suggested obtaining prevailing wind data for that evening and guessing how long the lights were visible, figure out a probable drift pattern and search for debris. The MUFON STAR team, using good science, did a search, and in fact they found debris from the "apparatus" along the path that the object took. So this was a good team effort, with the expected result for a hoax event."
Kudos.

Oh, just to reiterate, the two hoaxers should go to the gallows.
12 posted on 04/06/2009 12:30:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

No author credit, again?


14 posted on 04/06/2009 10:37:15 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson