Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wreck of First US Ship Sunk in WWII Revealed: Researchers
Yahoo ^

Posted on 04/02/2009 7:27:55 PM PDT by nickcarraway

The wreck of the first US ship sunk during World War II has been revealed in detail for the first time on the seabed off southeastern Australia, researchers said Wednesday.

Images of the merchant vessel City of Rayville, which was sunk in 1940 by a German mine, were taken by state-of-the-art sonar technology and remotely operated vehicles, Deakin University scientists said.

"It was very exciting to see the City of Rayville for the first time," said lead researcher Daniel Ierodiaconou.

The wreck could possibly still contain the remains of the first US sailor to die in the war -- more than a year before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour brought the US into the conflict, Ierodiaconou told AFP.

The 6,000-tonne City of Rayville was carrying a cargo of lead, wool and copper from South Australia to New York via Melbourne when it struck a mine in a newly-laid German minefield in the Bass Strait on November 8, 1940.

The ship went down in 70 metres (230 feet) of water off Cape Otway, just 24 hours after the British steamer SS Cambridge sank after hitting a mine off the nearby Wilsons Promontory in Victoria state.

"The approximate location (of the City of Rayville) has been fairly well known for quite some time," Ierodiaconou told AFP.

But for the first time, the team used sonar technology to develop detailed three-dimensional models of the wreck and collected video using a remotely operated vehicle, he said.

All 38 crew managed to make it into lifeboats and were rescued but one went back to gather his personal belongings and went down with the ship, meaning that his remains could still be in the wreck, Ierodiaconou said.

"The wreck is laying upright on its keel, with a slight list to one side," said Cassandra Philippou.

(Excerpt) Read more at tech.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: History; Local News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: australia; mines; worldwarii

1 posted on 04/02/2009 7:27:56 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Ping


2 posted on 04/02/2009 7:28:11 PM PDT by nickcarraway (Are the Good Times Really Over?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

What about the USS Panay?


3 posted on 04/02/2009 7:32:08 PM PDT by rmlew ( The SAVE and GIVE acts are institutioning Corvee. Where's the outtrage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The first U.S. ship sunk during WWII was the SS City of Rayville which struck a German-laid mine off Australia on Nov. 9, 1940, killing one mariner.

4 posted on 04/02/2009 7:32:45 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I always thought it was the Reuben James ...


5 posted on 04/02/2009 7:47:25 PM PDT by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The ship went down in 70 metres (230 feet) of water off Cape Otway, just 24 hours after the British steamer SS Cambridge sank after hitting a mine off the nearby Wilsons Promontory in Victoria state.

Then wouldn't it be the second ship?

6 posted on 04/02/2009 7:54:02 PM PDT by Trteamer ( (Eat Meat, Wear Fur, Own Guns, FReep Leftists, Drive an SUV, Drill A.N.W.R., Drill the Gulf, Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trteamer

First American ship is what they meant.


7 posted on 04/02/2009 8:04:46 PM PDT by bleach (Wake me in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Heck, I thought it was the USS Panay, Dec 12, 1937.

See “The Rape of Nanking.”


8 posted on 04/02/2009 8:08:32 PM PDT by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JoeDetweiler

While there is some debate, few historians regard events in China between 1937 and 1939 as part of the Second World War. Rather they were part of the Second Sino-Japanese War. As SJWII wound up as part of WWII, certainly a case can be made for connecting them, but the balance of historical consensus views them as separate wars at that time.


9 posted on 04/02/2009 9:35:28 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Thanks nick.
...off southeastern Australia... sunk in 1940 by a German mine
Wow, a *German* minefield, it really was a World War. :'o
10 posted on 04/03/2009 9:57:18 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; SunkenCiv; ExTexasRedhead; LucyT; ml/nj
German mine?

Not that the Germans didn't threaten American shipping, but that was in the Atlantic, not the Pacific. The Pacific location of the mine suggests that it was much more likely to have been Japanese.

11 posted on 04/03/2009 7:25:41 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson