Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GonzoGOP; KevinDavis

Please see my post #15 pertaining to my main issue with this.


16 posted on 03/30/2009 8:00:47 PM PDT by papasmurf (Trow da' bum out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: papasmurf; All

In all fairness the Mars ship (if we do build one) would look different..


19 posted on 03/30/2009 8:09:16 PM PDT by KevinDavis (No one should question our "Dear Leader"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: papasmurf
It’s too limited in utility

My issue is that it is designed to do too many things, and is unlikely to do any of them well. A moon ship is going to have an inefficient shape for carting stuff up to the ISS or some other orbital facility.

A mars ship needs to be stored, in space, for years and then start up first try with no errors. This tends to require systems so simple that they can't fail. But those same systems are mass inefficient in a ship just designed for Orbital or Moon missions where the ship can be kept active the entire time, or where the crew has the option of an emergency return home.

NASA needs to decide what it wants to do, then bill ships to do those jobs. If we are just going to truck stuff up to the ISS then a reusable makes sense. Mars shots are going to be a rare bird, if they happen at all with the current state of the economy. So an expendable ship built with a shape for high speed reentry, and with systems so simple it can't fail is probably best for that mission.
22 posted on 03/30/2009 8:11:30 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson