Posted on 03/30/2009 12:50:17 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Wonder if he's classified as obese in both pics.
1. Get on your bike
2. Ride
I’d be comfortable using the phrase benign obesity to describe my own 283 lb. 5’ 3” situation.
Glandular? = sorry.
Eat too much? = eat less. exercise. lose weight.
I myself stuff my face while watching TV and that made me gain a ton of weight. So I said screw it and started exercising like crazy. And now I stare at myself naked all the time.
But the bad part is my work has been suffering. Not calling clients back, ignoring emails. Too tired with all the exercising.
That said, there is a huge PC issue here involving nationalized health care, because if/when we get to it, the obese and going to become targets, and there WILL be a "fat police" unless they can come up with some science to show that they really aren't that "unhealthy."
Well, see, there you go. You're not overweight, you're undertall.
"Exceeding the CVATT may result in a number of metabolic disturbances such as insulin resistance to glucose uptake by cells. Metabolic profiles of patients with visceral obesity may substantially improve after only modest weight loss. This could reflect a significant reduction in the amount of VAT relative to peripheral or subcutaneous fat depots, thereby maintaining VAT below the CVATT. The CVATT may be unique for each individual. This may help explain the phenomena of apparently lean individuals with metabolic syndrome, the so-called metabolically normal weight (MONW), as well as the obese with normal metabolic profiles, i.e., metabolically normal obese (MNO), and those who are "fit and fat."
They can target the obese as long as they are also willing to single out those who engage in risky anonymous sex in washrooms while using a variety of unknown pills, powders, and intavenous drugs....
Tell me about it, for my height, I should weigh what I did in Jr. High (before I stopped growing). Granted, I could drop a few pounds, but I ain't getting back to what I weighed at 13 or 14.
Buddy of mine is a cycling fanatic. He rides, literally 100+ miles weekly, and the only fat on him is whatever he ate for lunch.
He's also got a stocky build. At his physical, his doc took one look at his BMI and told him to drop 20 pounds. "From Where?" my friend said.
Then he got a new doctor.
I’ll admit it. I’m considered obese, yet I have no issue with blood pressure, blood sugar or anything else. I have always said I’m the healthiest fat person I know. There are thin people who are way less healthy than I am.
Would I like to lose the weight? You bet I would and I have tried. I will likely keep trying. Maybe one day I’ll succeed.
There was a time when “obese” meant “really fat”. No longer. Now it means “not skinny”.
I wonder if that picture is a photoshopped one or if he really has lost the bodybuilder’s physique. In a suit, he still looks muscular.
Near all these “studies” on health and behavior have a hard time when it comes to causality or correlation. More people who are thin exercises, might eat healthier foods, etc. and weight and a high BMI might simply be a manifestation of unhealthy choices, but not the problem itself. What about someone that's heavier but exercises and eats well?
In the end, your quality and quantity of life will be determined more-so by genetics (excluding acts of God, crime or war) than anything else. You can drink bourbon and smoke cigars and make it to 100 as George Burns; or you can run marathons, not smoke or drink and fall over dead at 52 as Jim Fixx did of a massive heart attack.
What all this nonsense really boils down to is a few basic concepts. (1) We can't accept the idea of some sort of biological determinism. (2) We like to over simplify things and cook them down to some over simplistic idea, focusing on some singular variable. (3)People are lazy, so are many doctors and health care providers. This is the easy answer for everything. (4)We are an EXTREMELY trendy society where butter is healthy one day and vilinized the next. (5)Money talks, even in a socialist society, and those that use tobacco, consume alcohol, or engage in some other behavior or indulgences are seen as a cash cow. Insurance providers love smokers.
When you have a health issue and a doctor states it's because of smoking, being over weight, etc., I would go find another doctor. In most cases I would think it to be the easy answer that requires little thought, money, or any other effort. Real world example. My wife is a bit over weight, but by no means morbidly obese. She had hip problems and for years doctors told her that she needed to loose weight. The simple answer. We eventually found a real doctor who upon further investigation found she had a deformed hip joint, and ended up repairing the problem. Think about this though. Literally three US Army doctors looked at her, some X-rays were taken once (No MRI or CAT scan) and the answer more or less was always “It's your fault, loose some weight.”
These so called “risk factors” are all to often the lazy and simple answer, IMHO.
What you have to realize is that under the communist government Bozo is planning, there will be very little food per person. Can’t stir up dust you know during farming, can’t hurt little insects while farming, can’t plant this or plant that and people can’t grow their own food because of huge taxes on backyard gardening. This is the way it is done in communist countries, kill off the food production and then control what little food there is, a weak, starving people are less likely to revolt plus an undernourished brain cannot think well. We will all be skinny(read that starving)therefore having fat police will not be necessary. I am not joking.
See, good news *is* news.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.