Posted on 03/28/2009 7:55:33 PM PDT by JoeProBono
A truly amazing UFO story has emerged from the Ukraine involving a veteran UFO hunter and some very confused townsfolk. The residents of the Ukrainian town of Senelnikovo in the Dnepropetrovsk region had been seeing strange objects in the sky for weeks and were at a loss as to explain what they were. Many were suspecting that they were UFOs controlled by aliens. Talk of a UFO landing base near the Black Sea had been going on for decades. A town resident called on a team of Ufologists headed by Mr Vladislav Kanuka, a veteran Ufologist with decades of experience, for help. The Ufologists arrived at the scene last month and waited with a video camera near the railway station, a spot where many had seen the UFOs from. The Ufologists struck gold and at least one UFO did not disappoint them. A very bright pink orb was seen and the Ufologist agreed it was following a controlled trajectory. They managed to capture the craft on film as it landed in nearby woods. On realising the object had landed they made a rush for the landing spot but midway the engines of all three cars they were travelling in conked out! When they managed to restart the engines the cars started sinking in mud. They were only able to reach the site in the morning and found no evidence of the landing. Now the discs are seen by residents almost every day and once panicky residents are no longer scared: they have accepted that aliens use a spot near their town as a UFO landing base. Vladislav Kanuka remains thrilled by the success of the mission.
I turned a theory into a novel. See my profile.
I’ve never heard of such a silly notion before.
The distances covered by observed flying craft in the sky vs the distances resulting from hand held-jerkiness are considerably different.
The right angle turns at high speed have been observed
1. without any cameras
2. on radar
3. on cameras held steady against a wall or railing or some such or on tripods.
Thanks.
Interesting that the naysayers persistently avoid any rational comment on this list of quotes.
They seem to be quite aware of our guns.
Very rarely do our guns seem to cause them any problem.
Reports indicate that
1. folks seem to avoid thinking of cameras and guns in some situations for some mysterious reason.
2. folks have aimed guns at the critters only to be ‘frozen’ and unable to pull the trigger as long as the critters were in range.
3. folks have aimed guns at the critters and fired and seen the bullet leave the barrel in slow motion, travel a few yards and fall inexplicably to the ground well short of the target that would have normally been in range.
4. folks have fired guns at the critters and at their craft only to see the bullets bounce off some sort of invisible force field protecting critters and/or craft.
5. In only 1-3 cases have there been reports of bullets catching critters by surprise sufficiently to do them damage. I forget what happened specifically for sure but I think the critters’ comrades aided the critter hit back to the craft and that the critters’ clothing seemed to moderate the impact considerably.
How often have you tried taking a telephoto video hand held?
Or held binoculars at night by hand trying to view a moderately distant stationary light?
My thoughts are of all the ufo videos that appear to not have been faked, there are multiply designs. Possibly the occupants and/or designers are also of multiple origins...?
Strawberry flavored condom.......
There are two O’Hare videos..(see below link).
http://www.youtube.com/user/ohareufowitness
Interesting comments on the original video from ohareufowitness, I suggest checking them both out.
Comments from the youtube contributor, ohareufowitness;
I have sat on this evidence for over 2 years, mainly because of the nature of my background, if you knew who I was then you would understand.
I only got one minute’s worth of footage because my cell phone’s memory was full, and it stopped recording.
Back on November 7th 2006, I was near Chicago O’hare International airport when I was witness to what was arguably one of the most important UFO incidents in modern times. After the incident, many people jumped on the UFO bandwagon and came forward with false evidence, I can’t speak for these individuals, I can only speak for myself.
I witnessed a gigantic UFO hovering over the Airport at precisely 4:32 p.m. The UFO was a dark, hazy metallic disc/cigar shaped craft. It was at a height of roughly 750 feet from the ground, completely silent, frozen still, and was well over 100 meters in length. I managed to film the UFO on my cell phone for 1 minute, I observed the UFO for a further 1 minute, after which time it took off, and went upwards at tremendous speed and was gone.
If you watch the clip properly, at the start of the clip you can clearly see a large passenger jet taking off, and flying directly under the UFO, which shows just how huge this thing was. The UFO was completely frozen still, and any movement on the video clip is camera movement and camera shake. I filmed the UFO on my cell phone with the zoom set to full.
This is arguably one of the most important pieces of UFO photographic evidence in existence, and to ever be posted on the internet, simply because I know it was a genuine Unidentified Flying Object, and it was witnessed by many credible individuals, including pilots.
Yes I would love to come forward and go public with my story, but this is just not an option for me, due to my job. So that is why I have posted the clip on You Tube. For those who don’t want to believe the truth, thats up to you, but what you are seeing is genuine footage of an unknown craft, and shame on the worlds media for all the ridicule they threw at this unbelievable incident. Photo copyright 2009 ohareufowitness.
Uh... this guy is supposed to be a “professional” UFO investigator.
At least the second half of the video is more stable. But it is also completely devoid of any other features - trees, stars, the moon, etc - so it could be a toilet bowl flushing UV paint for all I know.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ioN-3UWYrY&feature=PlayList&p=A5B4897404F34F8B&index=0&playnext=1
Ball Lightning
How often . . .
in the excitement of something quite intense and startling or captivating
have you forgotten to do something you knew was important to do in that situation?
Good videos, imho.
Thanks.
oh please quit with your (not) clever pseudo-intellectual tripe ... very tiresome
Is your scroll button broken?
Down arrow works similarly, usually.
Be my guest at avoiding such threads.
Shallow, ignorant, clueless, ill-informed, haughty, hostile, irrational naysayer tripe
is not very interesting.
The topic was about UFOs, I gave my opinion which was relevant to the topic. You responded with a garbled, inane attack on me.
Perhaps you are the one who should avoid these threeads.
Thanks LVD, Quix.
dinoparty at #11:
Gee that’s really convincing. /s/
[Qx: What sweet sarcasm. A rather typical ‘contribution’ to such threads . . . actually a somewhat mild version of the usual]
Quix at #25:
We have your number . . . a card carrying naysayer
addicted to TYPE II ERRORS
and sworn to disbelieve until one lands in your lap and castrates you.
Got it.
[Qx: Doing my usual ping list manager duty of noting the UFO thread crashing naysayers doing their thing . . . just in case someone thinks they are ‘merely expressing a common garden variety opinion.’ . . . as well as noting the common hazardous addiction of most naysayers to a TYPE II ERROR.]
dinoparty at #76:
oh please quit with your (not) clever pseudo-intellectual tripe ... very tiresome
Qx at 77:
Is your scroll button broken?
Down arrow works similarly, usually.
Be my guest at avoiding such threads.
Shallow, ignorant, clueless, ill-informed, haughty, hostile, irrational naysayer tripe
is not very interesting.
dinoparty at 78:
The topic was about UFOs, I gave my opinion which was relevant to the topic. You responded with a garbled, inane attack on me.
Perhaps you are the one who should avoid these threeads.
Qx: So, which of the above sounds most like a PERSONAL attack?
And from the perspective of the 150+ UFO PING LIST MEMBERS, typically it’s the naysaying tripe that’s the most tiresome.
We don’t tend to find that haughty naysaying posts on such threads contribute much those of us who are interested in serious discussion about the topic would find attractive or helpful to the discussion.
We don’t tend to find such comments solidly intellectual; solidly reasonable nor solidly constructive.
I suppose 100% ignoring the naysayers by all of us seriously interested in the topic would be better.
However, it does kind of inform the unthoughtful and newcomers to such threads that a naysayer is doing their usual cowpie dropping/ flinging thing that the newcomers might want to be alert to.
Some naysayers seem terminally incredulous that these threads are
NOT
designed to be their cowpie catching basins.
However, I still think it’s an educational service to TRY and let them know that these threads REALLY are NOT designed to serve that function FOR THEM.
At least, that they cannot typically, on average get 100% away with cowpie dropping/ flinging without notice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.