"Sorry to burst any bubbles."
Thanks for your input. No bubbles were burst.
Sorry friend, but even Crop Circle Connector states that its likely a hoax. The hoaxer is named John Wabe (look it up). He did it at ‘First Cut Studios’ in Bristol, UK...
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/CPRI/wabe99.html
More to the point, confirmation of alien visits to this planet requires scientific evaluation. That means measurement. In the video link posted for this thread
there are 2 major problems. First, no attempt is made to identify a hoaxer (see above) or any other problem with the video. Second, the physicist in the video, Dr. Haselhoff, claims that the lenghened crop stems (nodes) correspond to the the equation for electromagnetic energy radiation (dispersion in this case).
The equation for electromagnetic energy dispersion is simple. The energy value, as a function of distance from its source, in inversely propotional to the square of the distance. This can be confirmed and measured even with a simple light bulb and photometer. Dr. Haselhoff claims that ‘in crop circles’ (Note: he does NOT refer to the crop circles supposedly made by these lights in the video) lengthened crop stems (nodes) some stem lengthening satisfies this equation. I have seen videos about lengthened and bent crop stems, but Dr. Haselhoff never provides or refers to any such physical evidence. He makes a claim with no physical measurements to back his claim. While crop stem deformation is interesting, and is a fascinating aspect of crop circles (in the rare cases where they have been found), mere deformation is NOT proof of alien visitation.
Were he to provide measurementsI would expect to find a strong correllation, across multiple samples, that demonstrated that crop node deformation directly correlated with the center of a crop circle. Specifcally, if his claim is to be believed, I would expect the rate of deformation to rapidly decrease as the distance from the center of the crop circle increased, and to do so per the inverse square relationship I described. He neither provides nor cites any measurements that substantiate this or any other aspect of his claim. He may very well be correct, but measurements are a requirement.
One also must ask what, if any, control sample he used.
In the end, this is about science, not what impression a video may make upon you. I do believe that there is substantial evidence that we are being visited by aliens, but this video is not, in my opinion, proof of that.