[marbren]

WoW! wasn't some of this alluded to in “The Shack”, or maybe I have my physics messed up.

[marbren]

Actually, after skimming a bit more, and it is fascinating, It’s closer maybe to whoville in Dr Suess’s work. I was trying to respond, but I forgot my screename on ATS. I would have asked, “Your real name is not Sheldon or Leonard is it?”

[Quix]

I don’t recall about the Shack.

I think I glossed over the esoteric physics stuff as so much conjecture.

I do think ACCORDING TO YOUR FAITH, SO BE IT UNTO YOU

has been minimized even, perhaps, by Kenneth Hagin. That is, I don’t think we have begun to plumb the depths of it’s import, efficacy and applicability.

However, I think that “faith” in “faith” is error.

Faith IN GOD is a must.

FAITH IN ANYTHING APART FROM GOD is a hazard.