Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kenny Bunk

I would be very suspicious of a Roman coin that was dated 125 BC. After all, the Romans did not use Arabic numerals.


25 posted on 02/06/2009 6:19:44 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus
After all, the Romans did not use Arabic numerals.

Lissen up, the Arabs don't use Arabic numerals neither. Your rude questioning of this precious heirloom's authenticity made me so angry, that I slammed down my Obama Commemorative Drinking Mug on my Commemorative Obama Plate and not only chipped it, but I got Java-Obama all over my Obama Teeshirt, the Obama blanket around my shoulders, and the Obama throw rug.

Furthermore, Buster, The Neapolitan antique shop guy told me the Romans ALWAYS used those numerals on your smaller genuine BC Roman coins, as all of them XLICMV thingies wouldn't hardly fit so good, now would they? Plus who the heck woulda been able to figure out the date?

27 posted on 02/06/2009 6:44:06 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (Ayers for SCOTUS. It's a done deal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus

I would guess the date was numbered counting forward from the founding of Rome(about 753 BC), AUC (ab urbe condita).


31 posted on 08/07/2011 4:43:20 PM PDT by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson