[Travis T. OJustice]

LMAO, you completely lack substance and have no factual footing, so you have to go with personal attacks, a clear violation of FR posting rules.

Pretty weak, and lame. Not wholly unexpected from a freakin moonbat who believes in UFO’s, though.

Transference is really ugly, werak and lame, too.

[Quix]

HELLO?

How about we lay out all the UFO threads in a line . . .

and note the points where personal attacks began . . . and whether those points were initiated by naysayers

or

folks honestly earnestly simply wanting to discuss the puzzle pieces with some serious interest and analysis.

Sheesh.

Talk about being out of touch with REALITY!

INDEED,

TRANSFERENCE

CAN BE HORRIFIC.

Did a mirror have a blip of functionality?

Oh, I get it, some of the truth arrows in recent posts struck home so the nastiness had to be ratchetted up! LOL.

[Quix]

BTW, I don’t consider my relative’s work experience lacking in substance.

I don’t consider the abundance of cases with hard tangible scientific trace evidence lacking in SUBSTANCE—quite the opposite actually.

I don’t even consider the mountains of credible reports by folks of high professional training and integrity who’ve experienced dramatic things to be lacking in substance.

I do realize that willfully blind naysayers, however, seem to have little capacity to appreciate the deadly hazards of a TYPE II ERROR in their suckup obsession with avoiding a TYPE I ERROR.

Mystifying.

[Quix]

I gather some folks linguistic comprehension and language analysis skills have prevented them from understanding that when one speaks to a class of persons of some category, one is not necessarily insisting that 100% OF EVERY PERSON IN THAT CLASS fits every comment made!

LOL.

Willful blindness strikes again!

[ZX12R]

Transference is really ugly, werak and lame, too.

You really slipped up now, Travis. I happen to know that "werak" in the GREY's language, is the word for deception. You are one of them, aren't you? Here to deceive and undermine our efforts to uncover your plot against the earth.

Admit it!

[Quix]

It would also be illustrative in our laying out the UFO threads in a line to

COUNT

the number of times NAYSAYERS MADE OVERTLY FIERCE HARSH, RUDE AND ASSAULTIVE

VERY PERSONAL ATTACKS

vs

the number of times [near 0.0] when folks merely wanting to discuss the topic reasonably did so.

One group tends to make comments about individuals and the other group tends to make comments about general perspectives.

I realize that naysayers’ perceptiveness seems to be so compromised that noting the above is likely beyond their habit and/or capacities . . . however, it’s worth noting.