To: JSDude1
"I won’t call Dawinism “Darwinism” when you all stop mis-calling Creation Theory/I.D. “relgion”!" We call it "religion" because it is. It certainly is not science.
To: Wonder Warthog
The term you’re looking for (for evoloserism) might be “ideological doctrine”.
To: Wonder Warthog; JSDude1
We call it "religion" because it is. It certainly is not science. So now what? Everything that's no science is religion by default?
432 posted on
01/29/2009 5:15:38 AM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Wonder Warthog
Prove it, Empircally?? Then I’ll believe you (and not through some nutty statement of some far-out website), but through scientific evidence that Creation Theory is “religion”. Untill then you’ll loose this because ID/Creation has validity, and Neo-Darwinism has “holes”.
464 posted on
01/29/2009 7:40:53 AM PST by
JSDude1
(R(epublicans) In Name Only SUCK; D(emocrats) In Name Only are worth their weight..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson