The Dems won the last nation wide election and you're not seriously implying that what they support is science, are you? All that global warming and environazi crap?
Maybe you forgot how badly Sarah Palin was mocked - rightly or wrongly - for her supposed Creationist beliefs?
Whether or not she is a Creationist (that's open to debate), she was mocked and belittled for being a Creationist.
You can't expect the American people to elect a person to a position of power when they believe something that is rejected by mainstream science.
Same goes for climate change.
Instead of rejecting the reality of climate change, the debate should be on the political response.
It's impossible to have a voice in a political debate when you refuse to acknowledge the reality that led to the debate.
Sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming, "It's not science! Junk science! Make it go away!" doesn't address the problem and doesn't convince voters.