I have an idea! You seem to think that it is possible to measure absolute angular acceleration. If that is the case, you should also be able to use a combination of laser ring gyros (three should be all you need) to precisely measure absolute velocity and direction too!
Why don’t you make one! We will call it Mrjesse’s Absolute Reference, MAR for short. You will get a Nobel prize (a good one for Physics, not like the s****y other prizes) You will become famous! Be worth Gazillions! I will be asking if I can come and work for you (would scrubbing your toilets be good enough for me?)
In fact, if you can make this wonderful device. I will become a Christian (or if you aren’t a Christian, I will sincerely try and believe in whatever God you believe in) isn’t that great? What higher incentive could you have? Is there anything better than doing Gods work and having fun too? Halelulujah! Praise the Lord. Mrjesse has found an absolute reference : )
Said LeGrande: I have an idea! You seem to think that it is possible to measure absolute angular acceleration.
Well, considering that acceleration is the change in velocity over time, then yes - a laser ring or artificial horizon or gyro heading compass can measure absolute angular rate and therefor could also be used to measure change in absolute angular rate -- or in other words, angular acceleration...!
But the real issue is whether any gyro can measure absolute angular rate or movement. You seem to be saying no, and I say "Yes, that's how laser ring gyros, gyro heading compasses, and artificial horizon gyros work".
If that is the case, you should also be able to use a combination of laser ring gyros (three should be all you need) to precisely measure absolute velocity and direction too!
Huh? How are you going to measure absolute velocity with a gyro which measures angular velocity....? I'm worried about you. You must know that angular velocity is different then linear velocity...?
I notice that you still refuse to answer my color coded questions, and you still refuse to answer my question about how I could have logically come to some other conclusion then that you know you're wrong and you refuse to admit it.
Seriously, why not just admit that you were wrong? You yourself once
said "
You should write what you mean. If you didn't mean what you wrote that is OK we all make mistakes. Some of us are big enough to admit it though." But are you big enough to admit it? What about the honor and accountability that you think we need (per your
FR page)? How can you describe your actions as honorable and accountable when you make claims, then refuse to admit they were wrong while refusing to find a single scientific proof that they are true -- and while refusing to answer simple questions which would put your claims to the test?
Why oh why?
Just imagine - if you admit that you were wrong and repent you can then ask for forgiveness. Most people will forgive you when you do that, even if it takes a while for them to regain their trust of your judgment. As a matter of fact, Jesus will help you be honest and true if you will trust in Him. I realize that you feel a freedom by not being "burdened" by the restrictions of "religion" - but is the freedom to like really a freedom? Does it not just get you in a bind later - one that's even harder to get out of?
And that really looks to me like where you are - caught in your own web of deceit that happened because you believe that you are free to lie.
Jesus
said
Come unto me, all [ye] that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
For my yoke [is] easy, and my burden is light.
(Matthew 11:28-30, Old King James)
The only deliverance from sin and lying is to follow Jesus. While you may think that you have at present no burden and no yoke, such is not true: You are yoked and burdened with the tangled consequences of your "freedom."
*Puts on "
Amazing Grace"...*
-Jesse