[starlifter]

You wrote:

“video analyzed by all manner of special effects and video experts for 2 1/2 weeks and declared authentic . . .”

Who are those experts (names and qualifications) and where are their declarations?

[Quix]

Hmmmmm

I had the impression that you had fingers.

And, that you knew how to type.

And, that you had eyes.

And, that you had a connection to the net.

I suspect, ASSUMING the above to be true,

you can track such down as well as any of the rest of us.

Besides, you might care.

As a psychologist, I found the video entirely convincing. Given that my profession entails interviewing folks and assessing their honesty and the plausibility of their stories . . . I’ll go ahead and trust my judgment in this case.

Folks given to denial and all manner of other fantasies, rationalizations and blindness are not much fun, anyway.

[Quix]

Is it really true that you’ve not VIEWED the video???

Your inane absurde pontifications about it are without having viewed it????

LOL

LOL

ROTFLOL TO THE MAX!

[TalonDJ]

“video analyzed by all manner of special effects and video experts for 2 1/2 weeks and declared authentic . . .”

Who are those experts (names and qualifications) and where are their declarations?

Exactly. Real facts can be documented. Assertions that are sure to be questioned MUST be documented.