[TalonDJ]

In terms of ‘anti-gravity’ propulsion systems, my relative, he’d fiercely disagree with you.

Did he show you his flying car? Because I would hardly call wanting actual evidence of a technology "willfully blind bias & hide-bound myopia".

But my disagreement is not based on lack of evidence of gravity drives. It is based on extensive experience with aerospace design requirements. To believe aliens were accidentally shot down would by radar is as dumb as how robots in movies go crazy all the time. Both are clearly concocted by someone with no real understanding of the level of thought and planning that goes into defense and aerospace designs. They relay for people to believe them on similar levels of ignorance and the 'sounds plausible' reaction from people with marginal knowledge. In reality engineers are far more methodical and intelligent than movie writers and give them credit for. Likewise whatever ET theorist invented the 'gravity drive - radar interaction' story did so based on having no understanding of the level of redundancy and reliability engineering thought that goes into a spacecraft. The idea that alien engineers were that stupid and myopic is insulting to me as a fellow engineer.


Besides, EVERYONE knows the Zartonians use PSI wave engines and not primitive gravity drive.

[Quix]

the engineers I have known have been top flight blokes.

I don’t know that the Roswell thing was crashed because of a change in our radar stuff that was unanticipated . . . that’s just an assertion made by a researcher or 3.

I suspect some of your assumptions are more farfetched than that.

You should know that things are extremely compartmentalized.

And, that textbooks are willfully lying.

But, hey, enjoy your construction on reality as long as you can.

Things are in a flux.