Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ForGod'sSake
During the 1999 expedition, Ballard’s team discovered a submerged ancient shoreline with a flat beach area beneath about 550 feet(168 meters) of water...

So how do you reconcile the two different studies?

24 posted on 01/25/2009 12:42:42 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman
So how do you reconcile the two different studies?

As an interested lay man I blame continental drift.

For those talking about Noah's flood, I suspect it was a low probability, high impact event ~4K years ago that lost absolutely nothing in the retelling (I suspect it was a tropical storm raining itself out over the Zagros Mountains that flooded Mesopotamia).

26 posted on 01/25/2009 9:27:53 AM PST by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
Maybe I should thank you for not pointing out the bad LINK TO THE ARTICLE I cited, but then again, maybe you didn't want to bring any more attention to research that contradicts a secular driven agenda. I doubt you searched it out yourself; whatever...

So how do you reconcile the two different studies?

Not having the wherewithal to independently research the two(of many) studies, I'm left instead making a choice of which I favor as more plausible or believable. I suspect you are in a similar situation?

Coincidentally, Robert Ballard was with the Woods Hole group for 30 years. Who do you choose to believe???

27 posted on 01/25/2009 11:41:24 AM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: A lie will travel halfway around the world before the truth can get its shoes on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson