So how do you reconcile the two different studies?
As an interested lay man I blame continental drift.
For those talking about Noah's flood, I suspect it was a low probability, high impact event ~4K years ago that lost absolutely nothing in the retelling (I suspect it was a tropical storm raining itself out over the Zagros Mountains that flooded Mesopotamia).
So how do you reconcile the two different studies?
Not having the wherewithal to independently research the two(of many) studies, I'm left instead making a choice of which I favor as more plausible or believable. I suspect you are in a similar situation?
Coincidentally, Robert Ballard was with the Woods Hole group for 30 years. Who do you choose to believe???