Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
I guess this is what defense for macroevolution has devolved into?

Actually not. there are tens of thousands of qualified people researching every nook and cranny of evolutionary theory, each looking for some unexpected feature or phenomenon by which to make a reputation.

On the other side of the aisle we have ID research which seems not to have published anything since 2005.

At least their forum is active.

331 posted on 01/23/2009 11:00:16 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

=[[On the other side of the aisle we have ID research which seems not to have published anything since 2005.]]

Good golly! You mean ID scientists who are shunned ridiculed, ostracised, belittled, maligned and subjectively dismissed out of hand aren’t published more often? Gosh- I can’t understand it- After all, it’s not liek when you do a search for ID reports that htere aren’t 1000’s and 1000’s of websites in hte throes of excstacy whenever ID gets ridiculed or denied something- Bais? Oh heck no- they aint no bias out htere-

What another brilliant hand waving defense of Macroevolution


334 posted on 01/23/2009 12:42:50 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson