[[What creation story do you think should be taught in science classes in public schools in order to cure our scientific ignorance?]]
None- what should be taught are the FACTS about Macroevolution- ALL the facts, and all the evidnece showing ID and IC- NOONE is suggesting religous precepts should be taught- just hte scientific facts- The fossil record defintively and objectively shows discontinuity- Baraminology, a discipline made up of several strict scientific practices, shows htis discontinuity conclusively, however, Macroevolutionsts go WAY beyond hte actual scientific evidneces, and make claism that simply do NOT fit hte evidneces and take a tremendous amount of faith to beleive in- You want religion out of Schools? Fine- let’s throw it ALL out- including hte religious beleifs in Macreovolution that DEFY several scientific laws and is contrary to the actual scientific evidences.
But what will the students do with the other 59 minutes, 59 seconds of the hour?
DEFY several scientific laws and is contrary to the actual scientific evidences.
Without conceding for a moment that the theory of evolution DEFIES several scientific laws (because it doesn't)--how does encouraging the teacing of a "theory" which relies primarily upon a supernatural actor (as creationism/ID most certainly does) increase the quality of scientific progress?