You get a prize because you are finally beginning to understand my argument. I impugn you and the author of the article for the same reason. I don't buy the argument that if you did around in some author's biography, then you have the causes of his art.
Warwickshire and Catholicism aren't evidence of anything. They both exist, but so do stars and kidney pies. So what?
So we believe that genius just operates in a vacuum by magic?
Even Archimedes needed a place to stand.