You said — “Not a reliable source.”
Well, I wouldn’t so easily dismiss a source, because a certain idea presented doesn’t agree with your own view of what may have happened.
In referencing another area of study — being Christianity, for example — keep in mind, if we did that within Christian circles with everyone, we would dismiss just about every other Christian around, because one particular idea of what the Bible says, or in another area of the Bible was different than our idea — we then dismiss everything else they say on other parts of the Bible. I wouldn’t do that with other Christians.
And for that matter, we don’t do that with other people “in real life” either.
FOR EXAMPLE — how many people are *dismissing* Berg (for his court case against Obama and his qualifications) — just because Berg *also has* a court case against Bush because Berg says that President Bush is complicit in the 9/11 attacks on America. LOL....
No, many of the posters here are simply ignoring what they don’t agree with Berg about, and going along with what they do agree with Berg about. They have not attacked Berg as being “an unreliable source” for Obama’s qualifications, even though they disagree with Berg about Bush being complicit in the 9/11 attacks on America.
Well, I wouldn’t so easily dismiss a source, because a certain idea presented doesn’t agree with your own view of what may have happened.
I've listened to plenty of Missler. He's occasionally interesting, but everything he says must be verified by other sources. Not reliable.