Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54
Not sure what your bias is...but for 2,000 years the term "son's of God" had a specific meaning!

If you want to twist it into something more acceptable to you...be my guest.

What is your dogmatic position toward our Word? What kind of position is it that defies and denies the actual (historical/archaeological/Theological) Word?

276 posted on 01/16/2009 7:28:01 PM PST by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: SonOfDarkSkies

INDEED.


278 posted on 01/16/2009 7:35:15 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
Not sure what your bias is...but for 2,000 years the term "son's of God" had a specific meaning!

Bias? 2000 years? I think you need to come up with a better explanation than that.

“Blessed are the peacemakers, For they shall be called sons of God.” (Matt. 5:9)

281 posted on 01/16/2009 7:50:54 PM PST by topcat54 ("Friends don't let friends become dispensationalists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson