Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler
I have seen you consistently say no one has proven..........

There are qualifications for being president. It is not the responsibility of the voters to prove that a candidate is unqualifeid. It is the responsibility of the candidate to prove they are. And voting for someone does not qualify them.

The fact that no one has required OB to do so, puts this into the courts. We will raise the issue until the evidence is made public. We will ensure that the issue follows OB throughout history, unless HE PROVES HE IS QUALIFIED.

You of course are free to keep stating that we haven't proven anything. That remains an open question anyway. We will see what the force of free dialogue and the energy of thousands of people might produce. Put your money on your favorite.

947 posted on 01/02/2009 8:20:50 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 838 | View Replies ]


To: nufsed

Well, Berg asserts the very same thing that I’m saying — in his court case, by telling the court that there are no laws that can require Obama to prove any more than he has already done through the system as he’s gone through it.

Therefore Berg is asking the court (in his case) to intervene because of what he suspect is true about Obama.

That’s getting right down to the basics of what he’s saying..

Now, the question the courts will have to decide is if — in one case here and now, they should ask more of this one candidate than has been asked of the others (in the past) — and furthermore — if it is even *legally required* to ask any more than they have already asked of him.

So, yes... the courts will have to determine that... and we’ll see for sure on that issue...

We can play the guessing games all day long about what the court will do — but I’m not really worried about what the court will do, because I’m sure that they will apply the law equally across the board as it would be for any candidate. And I’m sure that the courts will only take information that is proven. So, if it’s not proven — then it will be like the unproven qualifications for President Chester Arthur (when he wasn’t qualified to be President, but still was President). And if it is proven then it will be taken care of and that will be fine.

But, the courts better hurry up, because January 20th is coming up pretty quick. After that, it will have to be Congress who gets in the act in order to remove a President...


959 posted on 01/02/2009 8:28:42 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 947 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson