Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

Attorney is talking about British citizenship vs. American citizenship and the implications of such at the time Obama was born ...


704 posted on 01/02/2009 6:56:57 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

Yes, and as I’ve been listening to the attorney I think I understand the significance of the divorce documents now.

They PROVE Jr. is the son of Sr. As such - he can not be natural born due to being born under the jurisdiction of his father - who was not a US Citizen.


716 posted on 01/02/2009 7:01:13 PM PST by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

The divorce decree proves for the first time ever that Barack Obama Sr. is actually the father of Barack Hussein Obama II.

The spelling of Stanley Ann D. Obama in the divorce decree leads to a birth certificate that was registered at a port of entry in the US on August 8, 1961 for Barack Obama as having been born in Kenya. (No more details about that released so far in the conversation.)

Thus Ed’s argument is that he now has documented evidence to prove Leo Donofrio’s claim that Obama Jr. was subject to the British crown at the time of his birth and that he will soon have a copy of said registered birth certificate ...

Going to break and news ...


725 posted on 01/02/2009 7:03:42 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
“Attorney is talking about British citizenship..”

**

I'm listening.. He sounds like Alan Alda (Mash TV series) British citizenship is/was a perpetual descendancy. Obama’s children are British citizens.

749 posted on 01/02/2009 7:08:22 PM PST by Blu By U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson