Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler
I don’t know how much more scrutiny can be given to this, considering all that I’ve seen so far

Just one little thing, for a certified copy of the Original Birth Certificate, that the state of Hawaii says they have, to be provided directly to one, just one, of the Courts which have active cases seeking it's production. That would either make the issue go away, or blow it wide open.

BHO has not seen fit to request such a BC be provided. Why has he not done so? And instead sent lawyers to argue against "standing" and any requirement to provide the BC. However much they might have cost him it would be much much more than it would cost ($12 if done over the 'net) to have one provided to such a court directly from the State of Hawaii's Department of Health Statistics.

1,088 posted on 01/02/2009 10:01:04 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 826 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

You said — “Just one little thing, for a certified copy of the Original Birth Certificate, that the state of Hawaii says they have, to be provided directly to one, just one, of the Courts which have active cases seeking it’s production. That would either make the issue go away, or blow it wide open.”

Well, Berg was saying that it couldn’t be compelled and that’s the problem. If that’s the system you have at the present (and Berg says it is) — and you’re unable to get it — then you’ve got a real big problem. And if the courts won’t compel it, then there’s not much more that one can do.

You then said — “BHO has not seen fit to request such a BC be provided. Why has he not done so? And instead sent lawyers to argue against “standing” and any requirement to provide the BC. However much they might have cost him it would be much much more than it would cost ($12 if done over the ‘net) to have one provided to such a court directly from the State of Hawaii’s Department of Health Statistics.”

I know the arguments about providing the info to settle the accusations against him — as I used the same ones before the election... :-)

The problem that is at issue — is not what can be done to satisfy accusations that we see here (and elsewhere) — that’s not the real issue at hand. The real issue at hand is — rather — can one be “compelled” to show this documentation, or even further — can just one particular candidate be compelled to show this documentation and not others be compelled to show it. That’s what the courts are going to be looking at.

Now *after* they decide whether one can be compelled to show this documentation — then we’ll know whether we’ll get it or not. We will if they say it can be compelled. We won’t get it if they say it cannot be compelled.

Now, from what Berg has said — it appears to me that the courts are going to say it can’t be compelled under the laws that we have in place right now. So, that’s going to lead to a legislative solution to correct those laws.


1,106 posted on 01/02/2009 10:16:13 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1088 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson