Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler

WE DO NOT HAVE TO ACCEPT WHAT THE COURT SAYS. You are ignoring what I posted earlier or you’re still trying to come up with an answer. If the court or the congress do not ensure that the president meets the qualifications, we will ensure it is not the end of it. You can be as flabbergasted as you like.


1,036 posted on 01/02/2009 9:28:13 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1030 | View Replies ]


To: nufsed

Now this is very interesting. I always thought that if we followed through our Constitutional system that we accepted the outcome of our Constitutional process as the way of our government and the peaceful process that we have in governing ourselves, accordingly.

But, now I find that people are saying that they will not accept the Constitutional processes — and not even a Supreme Court ruling — if it does not go the way that their opinion says it should.

That makes me wonder if some are really Constitutional at all...


1,038 posted on 01/02/2009 9:30:49 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1036 | View Replies ]

To: nufsed

You’re wasting your breath. I went round and round with Star Traveler yesterday because he kept saying he wasn’t putting faith in something not “verified” regarding Obama’s dual citizenship. After about 10 posts of saying “It’s not about verifying anything, it’s a fact he was born a British subject” I gave up.


1,108 posted on 01/02/2009 10:19:06 PM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1036 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson