Posted on 01/02/2009 1:16:10 PM PST by patriot08
LOL I’ll second the love of history and research! Ok Judy, wherefrom in Canada?
That is scary. My goodness, I can’t believe how alike they are.
Either the decree will lead to the birth certificate as Ed has stated, or it won’t.
If Hale is an utter waste of time as you express what are you doing on this thread?
Who first found and then posted the divorce decree? You can’t give Ed any credit for that, can you?
I’m having a hard time keeping up, too... :-)
Wow. Thanks for dispelling a false perception that I’ve had for years. Didn’t they used to be a good source for such records? I’ve always heard that they were. Oh well...you learn something new every day.
where’s the morph of Aunt Esther ;-)
Hamilton, Ontario....about an hour north of Buffalo....but not near as much snow.
You said — “No. Stupid thought on your part.”
That’s certainly one thing you can depend upon Free Republic posters to let you know about with your ideas — when they differ with them... that they’re stupid... LOL...
No, the COLB shows 4th as date of birth, but 8th as date filed with registrar.
I’m playing catchup on this thread (and am not listening to the radio) - is your comment below about the divorce decree? - thanks!
“VERY INTERESTING POINT by the lawyer.
The document is invalid simply from having the Certificate Number blacked out.
Bottom of Certification says “Any altercation of this document makes it invalid”.”
You said — “Doubters of Chester Arthur at his time and place are long gone, of course. As to the present case, they are going to hang on like a wire haired terrier clamped onto someones posterior. I am with ‘em.”
Yes, I definitely believe that...
You said:
“Well, then I guess you don’t want to know the answer to that question. However, I would still like to know the answer to that question of how many pieces of legislation was invalidated during Chester A. Arthur’s term in office. That would give me some indication from history as to what we’ll be facing...”
Well it will not give us any real indication at all considering that it was never proven that Arthur was ineligible at the time. In this case e are still in the beginning of this process and it very well may be proven that Obama has a major problem in this case and then we will possibly see for the first time what will happen.
The Arthur case does very little toshine a light on “what to expect”
You also said:
“It sure is “hot” in certain quarters — but it’s certainly a total “non-starter” in other quarters. I guess it depends on what place you’re looking at it from...”
Well that is why I asked how many Supreme Court cases were involved in the Arthur case. It seems that it is already a much hotter issue this time around.
Thanks Lucy. Just got home and was trying to catch up. Your ping is most helpful.
-PJ
FReepers who are listening through my posts: I’m done for the night. Sounds like the attorney is going to take calls and answer questions. Ed Hale isn’t going to tell us where the port of entry is. G’night.
Could a copy of this B.C. at a port of entry have been kept in the records at that site?
“an architect in Chicago”
Do you happen to remember his name or the name of any architect firm? I don’t see a submitter listed on that site.
I know that you can look up the historical ownership of houses, but how do we know the owners didn’t rent it out?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.