Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AnAmericanMother

According to the accident report, they were both pilots, there was no passenger.

The accident report also indicates that the cow was uninjured, and the plane sustained substantial damage, so really it should be “cow takes out plane”, not “plane takes out cow”.


53 posted on 12/31/2008 7:36:01 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
1. No copilot in a biplane. Somebody had to be PIC.

2. Just because such an accident occurred, does not mean that the video is authentic. ("Fake but accurate"?)

The video just doesn't look right to me. I think a stationary biplane was superimposed on a background, two non-pilots got in and jiggled around (without their goggles) and somebody gave the wing spar a shove when they yelled, "NOW!"

58 posted on 12/31/2008 9:36:43 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse (TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary - recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Another point: unless there was engine trouble (in which case you would have seen the pilot frantically throwing switches and the fuel selector switch in the cockpit) there was absolutely no reason to take off and land again so quickly (certainly not among the cows).

Also: what are the chances of having a video camera on board and running when you just happen to hit a cow?

59 posted on 12/31/2008 9:38:43 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse (TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary - recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson