I’ve also included the — Admin Moderator — in addition to the previous FReeper I included, since you’ve put him in there. I put a line — at the very bottom — for the Admin Moderator — so he knows what is going on, on my part.
See the very bottom...
You said — “You are a fraud, a deceiver. I did not post to you.”
Ah..., but you’ll note that I was also posting to another FReeper who was involved in that discussion, along with you. His name, in my previous post, was “mylife”
AND..., by a peculiar set of circumstances, it appears that he didn’t post to you, either — and yet — you posted to him, thus “opening the discussion”. So, I was wondering if this was simply some kind of “fluke” on your part and that normally you did not post to others that did not post to you.
However, I actually find, on your own lists of posts, that you do — indeed — post to others who do not post to you. Very peculiar, given your sentiments just voiced...
—
A further “peculiarity” in your posts (to me...) is that you seem to be unable to simply address the issues involved, preferring instead, to accuse the poster who does not agree on the issues as some kind of “you-name-it” kind of poster... LOL...
All in all, it seems very peculiar that on a discussion board, where one is there to discuss things, and where people do post to comments that others have said — that you seem to think that someone shouldn’t post to you, if you haven’t posted to them — while at the same time — you go and do the same thing, yourself.
And then, furthermore, in keeping with the idea that this is a board where different ideas are discussed and legitimately so — that you stop discussing the issues and resort to attacking people who have ideas (in the discussion) that you don’t like.
It would appear that you have limits in your abilities to discuss issues and have only learned, in your own life, how to attack people, instead of discussing the merits and deficiencies of their ideas. It’s too bad that you haven’t learned any other ways...
—
And then — “You were caught in your deceit when you tried to use the story of the Good Samaritan as if you knew your Bible, yet you werent even familiar enough with the story to know the Good Samaritans role in the story. Youre a deceiver.”
So you say, but I don’t. But, then again, that doesn’t seem to stop you from attacking people. I think a good course in learning how to deal with issues, instead of attacking people personally, would be good for yourself.
—
And then, finally — “Dont post to me. You will not get anything more than more exposure of your deceptions. Ply your trade to someone else.”
And thus, like I said — you seem to only *know* personal attacks (which I don’t do, but I do point out that you’re doing them...) — and since you’ve given up on defending the “issues”, and so...
— I put this here for the — Admin Moderator — to also make sure that I don’t receive the continuing personal attacks that I’ve been receiving from you over a period of time (and absent me doing anything like that to you) and therefore — *as you wish* — don’t post to me in that same way (of which that seems to be your choice)...
Wow you sound a lot like my first ex-wife!
“Shudder”
So, lets take a look, to see if you were deceiving readers with your faux Bible lesson!
[Star Traveler: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2154244/posts?q=1&;page=305] You said He didnt say anything about being nice to His enemies. I think he did, in regards to the question of Who is my neighbor and who helped the injured Samaritan along the road (Samaritans were the enemies of Israel...).... I think Jesus made the point very well
Was this merely a typo? Well, you repeated the error, so we cant call the initial error a typo; you just arent what you pretend to be. But, in typical liars bluff not knowing when to keep quiet in your initial deceit, you tried to dismiss my calling you out:
To: Star Traveler
When you actually learn whom the Samaritans were and their relationship to the in tribe of Jerusalem, perhaps youll have matured sufficiently to not make large religious claims based on flawed references.
326 posted on Thursday, December 25, 2008 8:55:48 PM by MHGinTN
To: MHGinTN
Suffice it to say, if you studied the Bible and knew your facts
It appears you have no knowledge of the Bible or knowledge of Jesus, and thats a major problem in even understanding what Jesus said
341 posted on Thursday, December 25, 2008 9:11:52 PM by Star Traveler
To: MHGinTN
And Jesus made that an express example of the question of Who is my neighbor in giving the example of helping the Samaritan who was passed by on the road, by everyone else.
You obviously are like the Pharisees and the Sadducees who were always against Jesus and what He said, time and time again. I see we have them here on this forum, too in spite of what the Bible tells Christians to do
357 posted on Thursday, December 25, 2008 9:32:15 PM by Star Traveler
To: Star Traveler From your #305 post, you did't even know that the Good Smaritan was the one who stopped to help the injured traveler! You're a fraud, a typical poseur trying to quote the Bible to manipulate readers. Here is your exact sentence from #305:
Star Traveler: I think he did, in regards to the question of Who is my neighbor and who helped the injured Samaritan along the road (Samaritans were the enemies of Israel...)
361 posted on Thursday, December 25, 2008 9:41:15 PM by MHGinTN
To: MHGinTN
You said Youre a fraud, a typical poseur trying to quote the Bible to manipulate readers.
Its the exact same thing Ive been posting, from the Bible, since the beginning on Free Republic. Youll find no difference from Clinton, to Bush to Obama... You just dont like the content of what is being posted, and thats your problem. But, I wont be changing my posting.
The Samaritan was the person who helped. Ill quote the section for you... Luke 10:25-37
369 posted on Thursday, December 25, 2008 9:54:35 PM by Star Traveler
Yes, Id say youre a fraud. Youve tried to scam readers by quoting Bible verses you dont even have enough familiarity with to know the role of the story participants, and you tried to twist your lie into stating something opposite of what you stated.