[Mr. Silverback]

If irreducible complexity were proven, it would be evidence that the current evolutionary model is flawed. It would not prove that there is a God, or that he created.

So you've proven my point a third time. Really, you're too generous.

[allmendream]

It would not be evidence of anything and nothing in science is ever “proven”. Once again you have displayed your ignorance of what science is.

Moreover there is no positive evidence of irreducible complexity. It is an appeal to ignorance. I.D.’ers don't know or cannot explain (or more likely don't want to accept the explanation) how this structure could arise by natural selection of genetic variation; thus it must have been “designed” by the “designer”.

In what way is that not a “designer of the gaps” argument?