And you have confirmed my point. Just because you decry the idea that “irreducible complexity” is an appeal to “god of the gaps” doesn't make me pointing out that this is exactly what it is incorrect.
You think “irreducible complexity” is a gap in the explanatory power of natural selection, and you wish to fill that gap with the unmeasurable, unreplicable and unpredictable (and thus unscientific) power of “the designer”.
216 posted on 12/03/2008 9:09:05 AM PST by allmendream
(Wealth is EARNED not distributed.... so how could it be Redistributed?)