bump
ET left the porch light on.
Should not the mathematics and the “cosmological theories” tell why WHAT we see is WHAT we see?
Rather than assume that 90% of what is in the universe can never be seen and must be invisible? (Personally, rather than believe in “dark matter” - I've seen much more evidence for a Designer or a “God” than I've seen of dark matter and dark energy.
Then again.... Speaking of “dark energy” ...
Take an educated guess and call it science?
Let's wait for the reviews from the Hollywood critics. They make educated guesses too! (s/)
thanks aruanan (got these from his links page).
NASA Researchers Put New Spin On Einstein’s Relativity Theory
Science Daily | NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory | 10 April 2003
Posted on 04/10/2003 11:37:49 AM PDT by sourcery
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/890123/posts
Astronomers Deal Blow To Quantum Theories Of Time, Space, Gravity
Space Daily | Huntsville - Mar 28, 2003 | Editorial Staff
Posted on 03/28/2003 5:49:29 PM PST by vannrox
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/878827/posts
An Introduction to Zero-Point Energy
CalPhysics.org
Posted on 02/28/2003 2:59:02 PM PST by sourcery
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/854135/posts
Will Spacecraft ever Go Faster than the speed of Light?
Various - See Text | 16 FEB 2003 | Various
Posted on 02/16/2003 2:16:44 PM PST by vannrox
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844807/posts
Harvard M.D.Challenges Big Bang Theory
[try “reload” if it doesn’t load]
Source: SPACE.com
Author: Erik Baard
Posted on 06/07/2000 08:34:53 PDT by USA2000
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a393e6b9d1ff6.htm